Skip to main content

Content Origin

Report an Issue

Is content on Remx supposed to be original by the poster, or does it not matter (ie okay to share someone else’s work that excites/speaks to the poster)?
Saw this and knew I’d seen it before, so image searched and found it from a photographer in 2009.
Remx post:

https://remx.xyz/miracle-1111/drop/985a59f9-eac4-48ce-9457-d4f0808a697d

Original:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/garry61/3313091553/in/set-72157614502643660/

If posting unoriginal work, wouldn’t it be prudent or required to credit the original “artist”?
I’m all for sharing other people’s art to hype them and their work, but I credit them so people can discover them and connect if desired.

Posted by omsweetqm ·
Status: Completed1 comment

Log in to comment and vote

Comments1

  • Paul Spencer

    Team•

    May 26, 2025

    Thanks for reporting, we have another report for this artist and will be taking steps to make sure they are aware of our terms of service and that they hold copyright on original content that they post or will be banned.